Organizations are looking to improve their operational efficiency and enable digital transformation across all sectors to remain competitive and meet customer demands. According to a 2024 Gartner report, 56% of buyers anticipate increased spending on digital product engineering engagements over the next 12 months. This indicates a sustained and growing demand for new digital products and services in recent years. These insights suggest that organizations are not only recognizing the increasing demand for digital products and services but are also actively investing in the necessary infrastructure and strategies to meet this demand including implementing automation workflows. In this article, we are going to talk about the popular Ansible Alternatives.

Automation is the key to enhancing operational efficiency. At the core of every infrastructure lies tools for server automation, configuration management & orchestration, continuous integration & continuous delivery (CI/CD), continuous testing, and containerization.

Ansible is a server automation and configuration management tool that helps organizations maintain and manage large amounts of virtual and private servers. With it, you can automate repetitive tasks, deploy packages and applications simultaneously, and set up new servers.

In this article, we will explore the alternatives to Ansible and what they do.

What is Server Automation?

With businesses focusing on better operation efficiency, server automation provides a ready-made solution to managing configuration, provisioning servers, and managing build deployment. Server automation is a process of automating server life cycles on physical and virtual servers. In this way, you are sure that all the tasks you carry out across the servers follow the best practices.

We live in a digital world. Every industry must facilitate the move to the cloud or implement automation software to manage day-to-day operations. Manually handling these complex processes often means errors and delays for a system administrator. The server management process becomes significantly more efficient with automation.

Let’s take a look at some of the benefits of automating a server.

• Knowledge capture: The complete process is recorded in detail, knowledge isn’t lost when resources move on or revisit a project years after implementation.
• Time-saving: It can be very time-consuming to write configuration files, test scenarios, and deploy large codebases. By automating server calls and tasks, your company saves time in implementing and scripting them.
• Scalability: Automated software will ease provisioning, patching, and compliance concerns, letting you grow and scale your software successfully.
• Rapid application development: Pushing from development to production takes as little time as possible compared to manually handling deployments, builds, patching, and provisioning of servers.
• Reliability: It is almost impossible to eliminate human error from software development. With server automation, you can repeatedly test the build and migrate to production without introducing human error.
• Resilience: Immediately rebuild like-for-like systems to recover quickly in the case of a disaster if hardware fails or software is corrupted. It could take weeks for engineers to recover systems if not documented or developed with automation software.
• Cost reduction: In the long term, operational efficiency and automation are cost-saving. In addition to this, your team can focus on more complex production functions and features.

Ansible: Overview and Key Features

Ansible is a configuration management solution for automating the development life cycle. With it, you can provision servers, patch your application, automate deployment & updates, and run compliance and governance on your application. Some of the features of Ansible include orchestration, cloud provisioning, plugins, and security & compliance.

Your project connects to Ansible through nodes called Ansible Modules. You can use these modules to manage your project. As an agentless architecture, Ansible allows you to run modules on any system or server. It doesn’t require client/server software or an agent to be installed. With Ansible, you can use Python Paramiko modules or SSH protocols.

The key selling points of Ansible are its lightweight nature, easy-to-use interface, and rapid deployment compared to other alternative tools.

Key Features of Ansible

• Ansible connects and supports several CI/CD tools such as Jenkins
• With Ansible, you can expect a faster application deployment process
• Streamlines your software releases and reduces complexity

Top Ansible Alternatives of 2025

As we head into 2025, several strong alternatives to Ansible are available, each tailored to different infrastructure automation and configuration management needs.

Here are some of the top options to explore:

Attune

Attune is one of the tools similar to Ansible. It is a server automation solution for provisioning, patching, automated build procedures, and compliance across virtual and physical servers.

With Attune, you can accelerate builds & deployments and enhance security by facilitating digital enablement projects. It also supports Bash, CMD, and Powershell automation. With its node automation features, you can perform robust automation tasks such as configuring Docker on Raspberry Pi or setting up Home Labs.

Attune provides you with an easy-to-use interface to manage all your servers. It is written in Python and can run several scripting languages. It also offers a cross-platform automation solution, meaning you can automate commands and deploy files to Windows, macOS, and Linux servers.

Key benefits include:

It is Python-based architecture and runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux for Attune Enterprise

• Full-stack orchestration
• Multi-server coordination
• Agentless architecture with an easy-to-use modern interface
• A simplified task-scheduling process
• Portable and shareable procedure
• Implement existing scripts: Run a Windows Batch file, PowerShell script, or script for a specified (custom) interpreter on a Windows Server, Execute scripts written in Bash, Python or Perl, Execute SQL or PL/SQL scripts
• Generate documentation

Differences between Attune and Ansible:

Both use agentless architecture and both are freely available however, Attune allows the pasting of existing scripts to rapidly create automated jobs without learning a unique language. Additionally, Attune can export the automated jobs as documents for either management approvals, or knowledge capture, or to be followed manually.

CFEngine

CFEngine is a fast, scalable IT automation tool designed for large-scale environments, focusing on configuration management, security, and compliance. It helps automate operations, prevent configuration drift, and ensure systems meet security and operational standards.

With CFEngine, you can manage thousands of machines, automate tasks like patching and software updates, and ensure compliance with strong auditing features.

Key benefits include:

• Lightweight and fast, perfect for minimal overhead.
• Policy-based approach for large-scale management.
• Strong focus on security and compliance, with built-in reporting.
• Seamless integration with other tools.
• Scalable for handling thousands of nodes.

Differences between CFEngine and Ansible:

Compared to Ansible, CFEngine offers more granular control over security and compliance, though it may come with a steeper learning curve.

Rudder

The rudder is a user-friendly, open-source configuration management tool that ensures compliance and security across hybrid IT infrastructures. It’s ideal for environments where regulatory compliance is crucial, offering policy-driven automation to maintain desired system states.

With its intuitive graphical interface (GUI), Rudder simplifies configuration management and compliance reporting, making it easy to manage both on-premises and cloud environments.

Key benefits include:

• Easy-to-use GUI for configuration and policy management.
• Comprehensive compliance and reporting tools.
• Policy-based management for hybrid IT environments.
• Built-in automation for compliance and security.
• Real-time monitoring of system configurations.

Differences between Rudder and Ansible:

Compared to Ansible, Rudder offers a more accessible, GUI-based approach, making it ideal for teams without extensive programming experience.

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud infrastructure automation tool that lets developers use familiar programming languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, and C# to define, deploy, and manage cloud resources. This approach makes infrastructure management more dynamic and accelerates development by allowing teams to treat infrastructure as code.

With multi-cloud and hybrid cloud support, Pulumi is perfect for managing resources across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and more. It also integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes, serverless applications, and modern cloud-native tools, bridging the gap between software development and infrastructure management.

Key benefits include:

• Use of popular programming languages for cloud infrastructure.
• Native support for Kubernetes, serverless, and containers.
• Multi-cloud and hybrid cloud capabilities.
• Integration with cloud-native tools and ecosystems.
• Supports complex, dynamic cloud configurations.

Differences between Pulumi and Ansible:

While Pulumi is ideal for developers who want to code their infrastructure, Ansible uses YAML, making it a better fit for system administrators without coding experience.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy is a powerful platform for continuous delivery and deployment automation, designed to simplify the release process for both applications and infrastructure. It integrates easily with CI tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions, automating the flow from development to production.

Supporting both traditional and cloud-native architectures, Octopus offers robust version control, rollback, and environment promotion features. Its visual interface makes managing complex deployment workflows easier, while seamless integration with other DevOps tools ensures smooth release management and improved team collaboration.

Key benefits include:

• Seamless CI/CD integration for automated deployments.
• Robust release management with version control, rollback, and promotion.
• User-friendly visual interface for managing deployment pipelines.
• Easy scaling for complex, multi-environment deployments.
• Support for both traditional and cloud-native applications.

Differences between Octopus Deploy and Ansible:

While Ansible focuses on configuration management and automation, Octopus Deploy specialises in continuous delivery and deployment, with an emphasis on orchestration and version control.

Fabric

Fabric is a lightweight, Python-based library designed for automating deployment and system management tasks, especially for remote server management. It simplifies tasks like software installation, system updates, and deployments by allowing you to run commands remotely via SSH. Fabric is perfect for teams looking for a simple, script-driven solution for automation and developers wishing to embed remote server Management/Automation into their custom Applications.

Using Python scripts, Fabric enables easy task automation across multiple servers, often for web application deployments and maintenance. It’s ideal for teams working within the Python ecosystem who want a straightforward automation tool without the complexity of larger frameworks.

Key benefits include:

• Simple, Python-based API for task automation.
• Perfect for deployment and server maintenance.
• Lightweight and easy to integrate into Python workflows.
• Remote command execution across multiple servers via SSH.
• Fast setup with minimal overhead.

Differences between Fabric and Ansible:

While Ansible is suited for large-scale automation with YAML configurations, Fabric is more lightweight and Python-centric, making it ideal for smaller environments or teams seeking a simpler automation solution.

Puppet

Puppet is another alternative to Ansible. It allows for the deployment, configuration, and management of servers. Additionally, it provides configuration management, compliance, continuous deployment, and schedulability. Puppet uses an SSL-enabled secure encrypted channel to communicate through a Master-Slave architecture.

With Puppet, you can easily transition your infrastructure from a continuous integration pipeline to a continuous delivery pipeline with the orchestrator and code manager in Puppet enterprise. In addition, you can automate deployments and maintain consistency across multiple data centres while maintaining flexibility to alter parameters, application code, and environment settings as needed.

As things change in your business, Puppet lets you make changes while maintaining consistency and keeping you compliant. In addition to detecting desired states and providing situational awareness, Puppet boasts over 5,000 ready-made modules that are supported, approved, or contributed by the community.

Key benefits include:

• C++ and Ruby-based application that works with Linux, Windows, and Unix-like operating systems
• Continuous monitoring and distinct configurations for all hosts
• Reduces manual errors and supports scaling
• Provides control of all configured machines with centralized (master-server, repository-based) changes propagating automatically
• It is used by over 30,000 organizations, including Google, Red Hat, Siemens, Stanford, and Harvard universities.
• Puppet provides extensive documentation and references.
• Generally, Puppet Server works on any Linux, Unix, or Windows platform that supports ruby, such as CentOS, Windows, or Oracle Enterprise Linux.

Differences between Puppet and Ansible

Puppet uses a server/client architecture, requiring a longer installation process than Ansible, as an agentless system that only needs installation on the master node. In addition, Ansible uses YAML for configuration management while Puppet uses PuppetDSL with YAML datastore. The configuration management language style in Ansible is procedural, and that of Puppet is declarative.

Terraform

Terraform is another Ansible alternative for automating configuration management. It is also one of the most popular server automation tools with its easy-to-use interface and the ability to provision infrastructure across multiple cloud platforms. Terraform’s versioning feature makes it unique – you can version your service’s blueprint, just as you would your software. It enables unified command-line interface (CLI) workflow management of several cloud services through open-source IaC.

It includes HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) as a declarative language for defining and offering data centre infrastructure.

Key benefits include:

• Terraform is cross-platform, compatible with Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Solaris
• Implements the HCL language to allow resources to be described concisely with expressions, arguments, and blocks
• It can be used for managing lifecycle processes such as creating new resources or managing existing ones
• Reduces the risk of human error and automates resource provisioning
• Manages multiple services and public clouds using a unified workflow

Differences between Terraform and Ansible

Although Terraform and Ansible are both server automation tools, there are still a few significant differences between the two. For example, Terraform is declarative while Ansible allows for both procedural configurations and declarative configurations. Also, Ansible works best as a configuration management tool while Terraform leans towards cloud orchestration.

Chef

Chef is an excellent tool for maintaining consistent configurations across multiple servers. Moreover, it helps ensure that servers remain in compliance with established standards through continuous monitoring. The program handles complex systems well overall.

Chef makes it easier to manage and configure your servers. With Chef, you can integrate services such as Amazon’s EC2, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform to automatically provision and configure new machines. It enables all components of an IT infrastructure to be connected and facilitates adding new elements without manual intervention.

Key benefits include:

• The system configuration is built using a Domain Specific Language (DSL) written in Ruby and Erlang
• Enables fast and consistent scalability as your business requirements change
• Manages data centers and cloud environments
• Maintains high server uptime
• Server/client mode and standalone configuration modes are available
• It supports multiple platforms, including Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Ubuntu, Solaris, FreeBSD, RedHat/CentOS, AIX, and Fedora.

Differences between Chef and Ansible

Despite their apparent similarity in interoperability and scalability of configuration management, there are still a few things that set them apart when considering an alternative to Ansible.

To start with, Chef uses a master/client architecture with the server running on the master machine while the client side runs an agent on each client machine. Alternatively, Ansible uses an agentless architecture by pushing changes over SSH from a single source to many remote servers.

Also, the Chef Client pulls configuration directly from the server using Ruby DSL while the Ansible server pushes the configuration to the agent nodes using YAML. It also uses YAML to manage configurations.

SaltStack

SaltStack automates IT operations – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or hybrid – while securing, simplifying, and optimizing infrastructure. The Saltstack configuration management tool runs on Python. With Saltstack, you can run commands remotely, as opposed to Chef and Puppet.

The solution uses an automated system for detecting and reacting to events within any system, thus offering the most effective monitoring and management system for large, complex environments.

SaltStack can detect misconfigured or non-compliant systems and security vulnerabilities with SecOps capabilities. You can remediate issues as soon as they occur, ensuring that your infrastructure is always securely configured, compliant, and updated.

Salt supports agentless and agent-based architecture. Salt agents are referred to as minions. As a result, Saltstack allows code to be pushed to many nodes simultaneously, unlike Chef and Puppet, which pull code from the server for configuration. The process of compiling and configuring the code in SaltStack is quite fast.

Key benefits include:

• The Salt Master configuration parameter allows Minions to connect to multiple masters simultaneously by specifying a list of the Master addresses.
• Salt is very flexible— allowing for agent-only, server-only, and agent/server environments.
• It is a scalable configuration management system built to handle up to ten thousand minions concurrently.
• It supports the parallel execution of commands over remote systems.
• Salt is language-agnostic; it supports any language for configuration files, file types, and templating engines.
• With Salt, you can deploy, manage and execute commands with model-driven configurations.

Differences between SaltStack and Ansible

SaltStack is considered to be a more flexible and scalable option than Ansible for data centre automation.

A native CLI is available for Ansible, and Ansible Tower (Enterprise Version) is API-enabled while Salt also has a CLI along with REST APIs (which are not enabled by default) available, as is the Enterprise API that includes features like RBAC.

Powershell DSC

PowerShell Desired State Configuration (DSC) is a configuration management framework in Windows that allows administrators to define and enforce system configurations using PowerShell. It ensures that a system’s state matches the desired configuration by using declarative MOF (Managed Object Format) files. DSC supports both push (manual application of configurations) and pull (automatic application from a central server) models. It is primarily used for Windows infrastructure automation, managing system settings, software installations, and enforcing compliance.

Differences between Powershell DSC and Ansible

Powershell DSC is mostly used when managing a Windows Environment both on the cloud and on-premise (Most Commonly in Azure) while Ansible Targets both Windows (using WinRM) and Linux (using SSH). Both are state-driven idempotent tools and DSC supports both push and pull methods to apply configuration as opposed to Ansible which is primarily a push-based configuration management tool (Ansible can use pull method only when coupled with other tools). It can also be noted that Powershell DSC has a small level of community support compared to Ansible which has a large open source community backing it.

Which one should you choose?

If you primarily manage Windows environments and need tight integration with Active Directory, Group Policy, and other Windows services, PowerShell DSC is a better fit.

If you need a tool that works across multiple platforms (Linux, Windows, cloud providers, networking devices, etc.), Ansible is the better choice.

Choosing The Best Server Automation Software

This article has delved into server automation, a list of Ansible competitors, and their features, differences, and similarities. The best solution to choose depends entirely on the needs of your business. Each tool has its pros and cons that you must look into before deciding.